• New York City Council Repeals ‘No Dancing Law’

    Posted by on | No comments

    DJ First Choice
    DJ First Choice at The Anthony in New York City. (Photo source: Facebook)

    New York City Council members voted Tuesday to repeal the city’s controversial Cabaret Law. The bill still has to be signed by Mayor Bill de Blasio, but he has already expressed support for it, according to the New York Times.

    Established in 1926, the “no dancing law” prohibits dancing in public venues that don’t have a license. As DJcity previously reported, fewer than 100 of the city’s 25,000 eligible establishments have one due to how difficult it is to get.

    Critics of the law, like Thump, for example, have argued that it has a racist legacy. Councilman Rafael L. Espinal, Jr., who introduced the proposal in June, called the law “historically racist.” He said it also was being used to target small business owners.

    After the vote, Espinal spoke to a crowd of supporters at City Hall, according to the Times.

    “If you’re Latino, if you’re black, if you’re from the LGBTQ community, you all have been impacted by this law,” he said. “It is time we right this historical wrong and remove New York’s inappropriate and arbitrarily enforced dancing licensing.”

    In September, Mayor de Blasio signed another one of Espinal’s bills into action. It will establish an “Office of Nightlife” and “Nightlife Mayor.” Its purpose will be to promote “a safe and vibrant nightlife scene” for businesses and residents.

    The passing of both bills could transform New York City’s nightlife scene. More venues would be able to host dance parties without fear of getting shut down, which could lead to more gig opportunities for DJs.

    Related: New York City Council Member Introduces Bill to Repeal ‘No Dancing Law’

  • New York City Council Member Introduces Bill to Repeal ‘No Dancing Law’

    Posted by on | No comments

    DJ First Choice
    DJ First Choice (Photo source: Facebook)

    A New York City Council member introduced a bill on Wednesday that would repeal the city’s controversial Cabaret Law. The 91-year-old ordinance, which is often referred to as the “no dancing law,” prohibits people from dancing in public venues that don’t have a license.

    Under the rule, establishments that want to have dancing must apply for the permit. However, the process is said to be difficult, and only .01% of the city’s bars and restaurants have one, according to the Dance Liberation Network.

    According to a 1987 article in the New York Times, the law is “largely concerned with occupancy limits, fire safety, and the moral character of cabaret owners.”

    However, East New York Councilman Rafael L. Espinal, Jr., who introduced the repeal bill, argued at a hearing on Monday that the law is “historically racist.”

    “Espinal said business owners have complained that the law is used as a way into their establishments to issue other violations,” according to CBS New York.

    Bronx Councilman Richie Torres agreed: “We have no business criminalizing dancing, and the puritanism of the cabaret law has no place in New York City. It’s a law that’s racist in its origins.”

    In March, Thump wrote an article that claims the law was intended to target black jazz establishments.

    At the hearing, hundreds of supporters joined Espinal to voice their concerns. The councilman said their stories inspired him to write the bill.

    Small business owner Rachel Nelson said: “The Cabaret Law is a law that is arbitrarily enforced on minority populations and small businesses in order to shut them down as a neighborhood gentrifies.”

    However, supporters of the Cabaret Law say it’s an issue of public safety.

    “The city will argue that the law is not currently being enforced to regulate dancing and only to ensure the safety requirements,” Councilman Espinal said. “But the stories on the ground will tell you different.”

    In addition to repealing the law, Espinal has also proposed legislation to create a Nightlife Task Force and Office of Nightlife, which would be led by a “night mayor.” Its responsibilities would include regulating the nightlife industry and helping create a safer environment.

    Both bills have a long way to go, though.

    The next step is for the Consumer Affairs Committee to consider amendments to the proposals and vote on them. If they pass the Committee, they will be considered and voted on by the City Council. If the bills pass the Council, they will then be presented to Mayor Bill De Blasio, who will have 30 days to sign, veto, or ignore them.

    If the repeal law is signed, more venues in New York City might encourage dancing. As a result, the demand for DJs in the city might increase.

    Related: California Senate Approves Bill to Extend Alcohol Service to 4 a.m.

  • California Senate Approves Bill to Extend Alcohol Service to 4 a.m.

    Posted by on | No comments

    DJ Santarosa
    DJ Santarosa performs at the Conga Room in Los Angeles. (Photo source: Facebook)

    The California Senate approved a bill on Wednesday that would allow bars and restaurants to extend alcohol service to 4 a.m. The vote marked the first time a bill to extend alcohol service hours advanced past the state’s Senate.

    The bill, which is called the Let Our Communities Adjust Late Night Act, will now move to the State Assembly for a vote before going to Governor Jerry Brown for final approval.

    If approved, the LOCAL Act would let bars and restaurants sell alcohol past the current 2 a.m. cutoff time. However, local governments would be allowed to decide if they wish to extend the service hours. Establishments would also have to obtain permits from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

    Senator Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, who proposed the bill, spoke on Wednesday about the benefits of letting local governments decide for themselves.

    “The LOCAL Act recognizes that nightlife is critical to the culture and economy of many cities throughout our large and diverse state, and that local communities can make responsible decisions to support nightlife, if that’s the choice they want to make. By taking this nuanced approach to empower – but not require — local communities to extend alcohol sales hours, we can support nightlife in California while also recognizing that there is not a one-sized fits all solution for each and every city in our great state.”

    The bill still has some challenges ahead, however, as it faces strict opposition from groups who helped defeat a similar proposal in 2013. Their concerns include risks to public safety.

    On the other hand, support for the bill has surged since 2013. The rise of apps like Lyft and Uber are cited as a major reason.

    Related: A-Trak Reacts to Possibility of Expanded of Laptop Ban on Flights

  • Cash Money Sued Over Missing Drake Profits

    Posted by on | No comments

    Drake
    Photo source: Instagram

    Aspire Music Group has sued Cash Money Records over alleged missing profits and copyright royalties from Drake‘s first six solo albums, according to court documents reviewed by Billboard. The earnings could end up totaling in the tens of millions.

    The suit cites Cash Money co-owners Bryan “Birdman” Williams and Ronald “Slim” Williams, and Young Money Entertainment, as defendants.

    Billboard writes: “In the filing, Aspire claims that in 2008, it signed an exclusive recording agreement with Drake, then entered into an agreement in June 2009 with Cash Money Records that would allow Drake to record for the label in exchange for one-third of the net profits of his first six albums and one third of the copyrights of his master recordings for those same albums, as well as monthly accounting and payments.”

    However, Aspire alleges that Cash Money never paid out any profits outside of “a few modest advances” and that Aspire was never registered with a one-third ownership stake on any recordings.

    The court documents specify the albums as 2009’s So Far Gone, 2010’s Thank Me Later, 2011’s Take Care, 2013’s Nothing Was the Same, 2015’s If You’re Reading This It’s Too Late, and 2016’s Views.

    The court documents also reveal Cash Money’s alleged fraudulent accounting.

    According to Billboard, “Cash Money sent copies of its payments from distributor Universal and included deductions for recording, marketing and production costs, as well as artist royalties and advances, that had already been deducted from Universal’s payments — effectively making them double deductions. The result was accounting that showed no payments due to Aspire.”

    Aspire is not suing for a specific amount of money. Instead, the company is asking the court to supervise an audit of Cash Money’s books to determine the amount due.

    Related: Ed Sheeran Sued For Allegedly Copying Marvin Gaye’s ‘Let’s Get It On’

    Posted in Music Industry
  • Ed Sheeran Gives TLC’s ‘No Scrubs’ Writers Credit on ‘Shape of You’

    Posted by on | No comments

    Ed Sheeran
    Ed Sheeran in his “Shape of You” video. (photo source: Instagram)

    The writing credits on ASCAP’s website for Ed Sheeran‘s “Shape of You” now include the writers of TLC‘s 1999 hit, “No Scrubs,” BBC News has pointed out.

    The credits for “Shape of You” originally included Sheeran, producer Steve Mac, and Snow Patrol’s Johnny McDaid. However, the credits now include the writers of “No Scrubs”: Kandi Burruss, Tameka “Tiny” Harris (T.I.’s wife), and producer Kevin Briggs.

    Sheeran might have credited the writers to avoid another trial, though that hasn’t been confirmed. The English singer-songwriter is currently being sued by the family of the co-writer of Marvin Gaye’s 1973 hit, “Let’s Get It On.” They claim Sheeran’s 2014 single “Thinking Out Loud” infringes on it. He’s also being sued by the writers of Matt Cardle’s 2011 song, “Amazing,” which they allege shares similarities with Sheeran’s 2015 single, “Photograph.”

    Compare “Shape of You” and “No Scrubs” below.

    Related: Watch Ed Sheeran Perform ‘Shape of You’ on BBC Radio 1

    Posted in Music Industry
  • DJ Mixes Are Now Legal on SoundCloud, Says Founder

    Posted by on | 5 comments

    SoundCloud
    Image source: Instagram

    SoundCloud founder Eric Wahlforss has said in an interview that DJ mixes are now legal and “problem-free” on the service.

    Wahlforss told Germany’s Groove magazine:

    “During the negotiations for SoundCloud Go, we achieved agreement with collecting societies like GEMA in Germany, making these problems a thing of the past -– even for users who do not subscribe. This means that DJ mixes are now legal and problem-free on SoundCloud. So this is a very positive news for DJs.”

    SoundCloud was once the go-to platform to host DJ mixes, but many DJs have stopped uploading their mixes in recent years because of increased takedowns for copyright infringement. Some have even had their accounts deleted for repeat violations.

    As a result, many DJs have been uploading their mixes to less popular services like Mixcloud and Mixcrate. However, those platforms have been subject to increased takedowns over the last year, with Mixcrate closing its doors in October.

    While Wahlforss’ comments are encouraging to DJs and fans, it is unclear at this point if all mixes are indeed safe on SoundCloud.

    Related: DJs Should Stop Playing SoundCloud and YouTube Rips

  • Ed Sheeran Sued For Allegedly Copying Marvin Gaye’s ‘Let’s Get It On’

    Posted by on | No comments

    Ed Sheeran

    Ed Sheeran is reportedly being sued over claims he copied Marvin Gaye‘s “Let’s Get It On” for his smash hit, “Thinking Out Loud.”

    TMZ reports that the family of the co-writer of Gaye’s song, Ed Townsend, is taking legal action against Sheeran. The family alleges that Sheeran ripped off the melody, harmony, and rhythm of “Let’s Get It On” for his own track.

    “Thinking Out Loud” won Song of the Year and Best Pop Solo Performance at this year’s Grammy awards and went multi-platinum around the world. The track is also Sheeran’s highest-charting solo single to date, having peaked at number two on Billboard’s Hot 100.

    Both Gaye died in 1984 and Townsend passed away in 2003.

    Compare the two tracks below and let us know what you think in the comment section.

    Related: Ed Sheeran Covers Fetty Wap’s ‘Trap Queen’

  • New York DJ Sues Walgreens for Defective Earplugs

    Posted by on | No comments

    Earplugs

    TMZ has reported that a New York DJ is suing drug store chain Walgreens for selling him defective earplugs, which allegedly damaged his ears.

    Joseph Alpern, aka J Gabriel, claims he used the earplugs during a gig in 2013 and experienced “an immediate sharp pain” and “a ringing sound” after he removed them.

    Alpern went to a specialist who told him he has permanent nerve damage. The doctor said the plugs were sealed too tightly and damaged his eardrums when he pulled them out.

    Alpern says he now suffers from chronic headaches and fatigue and can’t listen to music at regular volumes.

    He is seeking $640,000 in damages.

    Check out Mojaxx’s budget earplug recommendations below.

    Related: Budget Earplugs for DJs

    Posted in DJ Culture
  • The Weeknd Gets Sued Over ‘The Hills’

    Posted by on | 2 comments

    The Weeknd
     
    It’s been a week of ups and downs for The Weeknd. According to the Hollywood Reporter, the R&B singer was slapped with a lawsuit on Wednesday over his hit single, “The Hills.” The suit came just two days after the Toronto native received seven Grammy nominations.
     
    Cutting Edge Music Limited, a film financier based in the UK, alleges that “The Hills” illegally samples Tom Raybould’s score for the 2013 sci-fi film, The Machine.
     
    The defendants named in the case include The Weeknd (Abel Tesfaye), producers Emmanuel “Million Dollar Mano” Nickerson and Carlo “Illangelo” Montagnese, co-writer Ahmad “Belly” Balshe, and music companies Universal, Warner Chappell, and Sony/ATV.
     
    According to the complaint (read in full here), “On or about March 9, 2015, Defendant MANO sent Raybould a Twitter direct message stating ‘I sampled your music might make it 2 the weeknd next album. Huge fan of what u did 4 the machine movie!'”
     
    “The Hills” was released in May as the second single from The Weeknd’s album, Beauty Behind the Madness. It has topped multiple charts and sold over two million units.
     
    Compare the two songs below.
     

     

     
    Related: Watch The Weeknd’s ‘In the Night’ Video

  • Watch Robin Thicke and Pharrell’s ‘Blurred Lines’ Testimonies

    Posted by on | No comments

    Pharrell and Robin Thicke
     
    Video has surfaced of Robin Thicke and Pharrell’s depositions in their lawsuit with the Marvin Gaye estate.
     
    The exclusive footage, which was obtained by The Hollywood Reporter, comes months after a judge ruled that Thicke and Pharrell ripped off Gaye’s “Got To Give It Up.” The two artists were ordered to pay $5.4 million to Gaye’s estate, which they are now appealing.
     
    Watch Thicke and Pharrell’s candid responses below.
     


     
    Related: Jury Rules Against Robin Thicke & Pharrell in ‘Blurred Lines’ Trial